Guild icon
Tulpa.info
Meta / metaphysics
This is the channel for the discussion of metaphysical and parapsychological subjects. Please keep discussion of these topics to this channel and out of the rest of the server.
Avatar
Keep in mind, consciousness here is defined as a multisensory experience that includes a sense of "I exist"
12:03 AM
There is no experience in deep sleep
12:03 AM
The body/mind still functions, but consciousness is "at rest"
12:03 AM
or "in its potential state"
12:04 AM
Remind me what epistemological means?
12:05 AM
Because I don't know that I do
12:05 AM
Btw "classical" non-dual teachings do say that consciousness is ever present, even in deep sleep and possibly death
12:06 AM
My teacher uses the words consciousness and experience (or "knowing") interchangeably, and at a minimum we can say that if we do have an experience in deep sleep, we don't remember it
12:09 AM
It's really sort of tangential. It's not really important if there is consciousness in deep sleep or not, because what we're looking for (and what's available) is happiness in waking life
12:09 AM
As far as knowing goes, we can't know that there is an experience in deep sleep that we forget about later, so no reason to have a belief about it
12:10 AM
Do you? You just infer it from memories about the past
Avatar
i've heard it said that if you get hypnotized you can remember being born
12:11 AM
then it's just a memory you'll probably never recover
Avatar
I would be skeptical of that personally luso. fake memories are a thing and hypnosis can lead to a person giving you fake memories
Avatar
no, my parents also confirm that I was in fact born
You infer that you must have been born because it's the model that best fits your present moment experience
12:12 AM
But all you can know is that you're conscious of this moment right here right now
12:13 AM
You're aware, and if someone asked you if you were alive, you would say yes
Avatar
yeah this is getting deeply into preachy mode
Avatar
yeah this is getting deeply into preachy mode
With everything I say, please in your mind add the disclaimer "but that's just a concept designed to aid us in exploring our own experience"
Avatar
Shake, you seem to be slipping into a modality of "this is what YOU experience" while at the same time saying that "I am not able to know what it is that you experience; I can only know my own experiences"
Avatar
Felix, again, this is a non-dual teaching that states both are equally valid perspectives: We're a body/mind organism living in a spacetime universe, and we're an experience arising in consciousness. Although all we can really know is the second half
12:16 AM
slipping into a modality of "this is what YOU experience"
Yeah it's called a description ;P a concept
12:16 AM
Remind me what Boltzmann brain is?
12:17 AM
I think it's plenty coherent. Our experience can be validly described by both models
12:18 AM
The point is we can't know if the world is independently real, but we can know that we're having this experience right here, right now
12:19 AM
Hmm not sure what you mean by veil of perception
Avatar
your god has no power here
Avatar
This description says if there is something "beyond" our sensory experience, we can't know it. For all intents and purposes, the experience feels like that of a human being in an objective world, but all we know is that the experience "arises" in our consciousness, meaning our awareness and our sense of existence
12:24 AM
Let me also add that this framework is not intended as a philosophy. This is sort of the "metaphysical" backbone to a description of what happiness in waking life is, and why it's available
Avatar
yeah, and then just dismissing any cutting arguments people make by saying it's just a concept
👆 1
Avatar
I know this seems to be unhelpful, but again none of these are intended as "truths". It's meant for us to play around with concepts like, "can I know that there is an external world? Can I know that the past and future are real, just because this present moment is real?" and presumably these verbal concepts will translate into an experience that's conducive for removing our psychological resistance to circumstance
12:30 AM
Have to brb
Avatar
And if it's not a truth; just a thinking exercise then why share it in the way that you're saying it? By using absolute statements and then refuting any argument with a statement like oh it's not really all that serious as you're making it out to be. It makes me wonder why even bother opening the floor to discussion.
Avatar
lolll talk about assuming ill intention
12:41 AM
By using absolute statements
I'm really trying my best to add disclaimers anywhere I can. The full disclaimer usually offered goes like this: "These are just concepts, all you can know is that you're conscious, but even that is just a concept"
Avatar
This is why it feels preachy. Preachy from my definition as when a person (a pastor) is speaking from a podium and expecting the congregation to just go along with everything that's being said. Then, if a congregation member steps up the preacher just offers a dismissive phrase and moves on with the sermon. It's incredibly frusterating and my kneejerk reactions to your statements are why I haven't yet responded to the conversation we were having in dms.
Avatar
Heh wow all I can say is I'm sort of surprised it comes across as "preachy", although I think even in pastor/congregation situations, there is usually an understanding that the sermon is to some extent conceptual
12:44 AM
I also feel like the only thing that I'm "dismissive" of is the absoluteness of my own descriptions lol? I don't think I've really disagreed with either of you
12:46 AM
I guess I still have trouble understanding what you disagree with, what you think is incoherent about it
12:47 AM
I don't know how much clearer I can say it. Anything "beyond the veil" can only be inferred. The best we can "know" is that we're conscious of this present moment experience, anything else is just our conceptualization of the experience
Avatar
Deleted User 5/5/2020 12:48 AM
Has anyone here read any legitimate phenomenology lol? May I recommend Thomas Nagel and Merleau-Ponty; they help elaborate on how to avert the epistemological/phenomenological logical pitfalls you’re falling into. also felix invited me here. Hewwo
12:49 AM
lil kassie on da mic
12:50 AM
but yeah please read theory
Avatar
Okay so it says the only thing we can know is the present moment experience, but that the experience consistently presents as one of cause and effect, the experience of a human body/mind subject in an objective world. Classically, a spiritual seeker first recognizes that only consciousness is ultimately knowable, but then an integration needs to happen because the experience continues to present as that of a person living in a spacetime universe
12:58 AM
It doesn't have to be inferred. You can close your eyes right now (or not) and be aware of the present moment, which includes the sense that you exist. In deep meditation, all other components of the experience fall away. In deep sleep (as far as we know), even that falls away
1:01 AM
Everything else, like "the world really exists" is at best inferred, at worst a belief
1:01 AM
The purpose of this framework is to uproot a certain belief that is described as causing all of our psychological unhappiness
Avatar
@Deleted User welcome to the server btw
Avatar
Deleted User 5/5/2020 1:02 AM
thank you ^^
Avatar
The belief that we are an independent "doer" entity that's separate from and uninfluenced by life. The belief that we could and should have acted differently in the past, so that means we're a failure; the belief that others could and should have acted differently in the past, and so we have to hate them; and the belief that future circumstance needs to turn out pleasant in order for us to be complete, because pain subtracts from who we are.
1:06 AM
The framework describes that when these beliefs fall away, the resulting attitude of personal doership and attachment to outcomes falls away, and what remains is unbroken peace of mind regardless of (physical or emotional) pleasure or pain in the present moment.
1:08 AM
And that this peace of mind is what spiritual seeking eventually turns to once it becomes clear that this is the sustainable happiness that's available
1:12 AM
Life meaning that which created us when the sperm and egg came together to design our genetic blueprint, and that which has grown, shaped, conditioned and lived us in every moment since. That which makes our hair grow, our lungs breathe, our digestive system function, thinks through us, speaks through us, acts through us
1:13 AM
Lol I mean sure. I'm not the one who insists that concepts need to be truths!
1:13 AM
This is simply one description of our experience
1:14 AM
lmao
Avatar
It becomes dismissive when, instead of responding to the criticism itself, you just backpedal and say the topic being criticized is just a concept.
1:15 AM
i'm listening to this podcast that was shared. Lets, before continuing this circular discussion, all just listen to that for 22 minutes (edited)
Avatar
The criticism was: "According to the framework, everything is inferred, so therefore we should not form concepts about our experience at all." Which is one valid way of coming to an understanding of our unhappiness, but it's a lot easier when there are some concepts presented along the way, not to hold as beliefs but as "thought experiments", which I insist is all I'm trying to do here
1:19 AM
The framework essentially says that there are two valid perspectives we can have about our life experience, but in order for us to recognize what it is that the other perspective points to, that perspective has to be described with concepts, such as "life created, shaped, grew, conditioned and lived us in each moment"
1:19 AM
It's not any more "true" than "we are human subjects in an objective world", but it's not any less true, either
1:21 AM
The "goal" is really the falling away of all beliefs, and all these concepts are just meant to aid with that. "Consider that life is in some ways no different from a dream" etc
1:27 AM
Belief: "I have always acted of my own volition." Thought experiment: "You've been created, conditioned and lived by life." Possible outcomes: 1)"Bullshit, I always act of my own volition." 2) "Wow, I guess volition is an illusion. I'm a mechanical instrument functioning in the only way possible." 3) "I recognize that all of my actions are determined by factors outside of my control, and I feel free to do whatever I choose in each moment." (edited)
1:27 AM
1) is the belief before becoming interested in spiritual teachings, 2) is a placeholder belief installed by spiritual teachings in order to bring about 3), which is the absence of beliefs
1:28 AM
I replaced "but" with "and"
1:34 AM
It's a recognition that we live in a universe that is subject to cause and effect, meaning that our actions are also the result of cause and effect, the result of the laws of physics. As long as we don't discount the feeling of free will that's always part of our experience, it's not a "belief" that's clearly at odds with the universe as we know it (or infer it, lol). But even while we hold onto it as a "placeholder belief", it causes much less psychological resistance than the belief in complete, independent volition (edited)
1:36 AM
lol phew wipes sweat off brow
1:38 AM
Just cause I haven't whipped 'em out yet today, the framework says that our psychological attitude of personal doership manifests essentially in five ways: 1. guilt and shame, 2. blame and hatred, 3. pride and arrogance, 4. worries & anxiety, 5. expectations & attachment to outcomes
1:39 AM
In short, "I'm a failure, I hate you, and if circumstance is pain rather than pleasure, I'm incomplete and cannot be happy"
1:40 AM
Based on the belief that life could and should have unfolded differently than the laws of physics caused it to (edited)
1:43 AM
Basically! Although it says "you can't help but worry as long you understand yourself as separate from life"
1:43 AM
It's just a description, not an instruction of how to "get there"
1:44 AM
It says "after an understanding sinks in, based on new conditioning delivered by life, eventually the attitude that gets in the way of peace of mind falls away"
1:46 AM
It can't be an instruction because the whole point is to bring about a recognition (or at least enable the perspective) that in each moment, life moves us, brings about new circumstance, new conditioning that changes our functional design, etc
1:47 AM
lol alright
Avatar
All I hoped for ;P
Avatar
pointy
Avatar
Consciousness is, in one sense, the most basic/constant functioning of a person (and, in all likelihood more generally, of a live organism)
11:27 PM
We now know that even plants are in some sense aware. Do they have a sense of existence? How can we ever know?
11:28 PM
lmao
11:29 PM
What is ratpiss, my anti-human-supremacist stance?
Avatar
oh, that's a variant of bullshit
11:29 PM
Please try and be a bit more civil here, not a lot of mods watch this channel but it still falls under the rules @Deleted User
Avatar
Images like that should go in #media if out of context, I assume that wasn't related to metaphysics either.
Avatar
@Reguile Thank you for looking out for this teensy aspect of the community
Avatar
np, happy to glance in here once a month or so!
Avatar
Wow I look like a lunatic now that what's-his-face's posts were deleted
Avatar
I hate hate hate discord for auto-selecting "delete last 24 hours of posts", because that happens, sorry about that.
Avatar
Whoa was he banned?!
Avatar
Yup, for shitposting along with YV
Avatar
Ah I missed that
Avatar
huh. all my shitposting and i'm still here
Avatar
This was a whole different level
1:48 AM
and don't let yourself steriotype yourself as a shitposter
Avatar
haha
Avatar
Unfastened Belts 5/6/2020 1:48 AM
Bad singlet!
Avatar
i'll just keep staying in this channel. it's too easy/ fun to piss off Apollo
Avatar
Unfastened Belts 5/6/2020 1:49 AM
Apollo means well
Avatar
Apollo can mean well from over there
Avatar
Unfastened Belts 5/6/2020 1:49 AM
lol
Exported 100 message(s)
Timezone: UTC+0
Page 1 ... Page 71 ... Page 72 ... Page 73 ... Page 249